Dexmedetomidine-propofol versus ketamine-propofol for sedation of cancer patients undergoing computerized tomography guided bone biopsy: a randomized double-blind trial

  • Ahmed Salah Abdelgalil
  • Ahmed Mansour Mohammed
  • Ayman Sharawy Abdelrahman
  • Norma Osama Abdallah Zayed
Keywords: Dexmedetomidine, Ketamine, Propofol, Computed tomography, Bone biopsy, Morphine

Abstract

Background & Objective: Patients suffering from malignancy, often need to undergo computed tomography (CT) for evaluation or for CT-guided bone biopsy. They are shifted to the radio-diagnostic suite and require sedation and analgesia during this procedure. We compared the efficacy and safety of combining dexmedetomidine (DEX) or ketamine with propofol for better sedation among these patients undergoing CT-guided bone biopsy.

Methodology: This randomized, double-blind study was done on 60 adult cancer patients undergoing CT-guided bone biopsy. Patients were randomized into two equal groups. Group D received DEX 1 µg/kg (over 10 min) + propofol 2.5 mg/kg intravenous (IV). It was followed by DEX 0.5 µg/kg/h + propofol 2.5 mg/kg/h infusion. Group K received ketamine 1 mg/kg + propofol 2.5 mg/kg IV, followed by ketamine 0.25 mg/kg/h + propofol 2.5 mg/kg/h infusion.

Results: The total intra-procedure propofol consumption was significantly decreased in Group D than in Group K (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale score at 15 min and 30 min post-procedure, number of patients requiring morphine and paracetamol within one hour of procedure and the recovery times were significantly decreased in Group D than in Group K (P < 0.05). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) measurements at 10 min, 20 min, end of the procedure, and 15 min, 30 min post-procedure was significantly decreased in Group D than in Group K (P < 0.05). Adverse events, e.g., postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypotension, and bradycardia, were comparable.

Conclusion: DEX-propofol combination had superior sedation efficacy as noted through lower pain scores, intraprocedural propofol or postprocedural morphine and paracetamol consumption, and the shorter recovery time during CT-guided bone biopsy compared to ketamine-propofol combination. However, ketamine-propofol combination exhibited superior hemodynamic stability, as shown by more consistent HR and MAP.

Keywords: Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Propofol; Computed tomography; Bone biopsy; Morphine

Citation: Abdelgalil AS, Mohammed AM, Abdelrahman AS, Zayed NOA. Dexmedetomidine-propofol versus ketamine-propofol for sedation of cancer patients undergoing computerized tomography guided bone biopsy: a randomized double-blind trial. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2024;28(5):809−815; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v28i5.2554

Received: Jun 17, 2024; Reviewed: Jul 31, 2024; Accepted: Aug 19, 2024

Published
10-08-2024
How to Cite
Abdelgalil, A., Mohammed, A., Abdelrahman, A., & Abdallah Zayed, N. O. (2024). Dexmedetomidine-propofol versus ketamine-propofol for sedation of cancer patients undergoing computerized tomography guided bone biopsy: a randomized double-blind trial. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 28(5), 809-815. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v28i5.2554
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH