Conventional mechanical ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia of neonates: a systematic review

  • Christopher Kapuangan
  • Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan
  • Raihanita Zahra
  • Dr Rahendra
  • Ratna Farida Soenarto
  • Ezra Hanawi
Keywords: Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia, Conventional Mechanical Ventilation, High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Abstract

Background: Neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) present with respiratory distress and circulatory insufficiency, requiring immediate intubation and mechanical ventilation. Studies in the literature present contradictory results regarding the optimal ventilation mode for neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia. We present a systematic review of the selected literature regarding high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) compared to conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

Methodology: PubMed, SCOPUS, EBSCOhost, and ProQuest databases were used to identify literature regarding HFOV compared to CMV in a CDH. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for cohort studies and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool for randomized clinical trials.

Results: Four studies were identified and considered eligible for the study. One study was a randomized clinical trial, and the other three cohort studies. Patients in the high-frequency oscillatory (HFO) group presented with a higher length of ventilation and hospital stay. There was a lack of evidence regarding any significant difference in the mortality rate.

Conclusion:  We cannot make an evidence-based recommendation regarding the superiority of either CMV or HFOV as the optimal ventilation method in neonates with CDH. However, almost all studies observed a lengthened period of ventilation and time required before surgical repair in the HFOV group.

Abbreviations: CDH: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; CLD: chronic lung disease; CMV: conventional mechanical ventilation; GER: gastroesophageal reflux; HFOV: high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; NOS: Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; RDS: respiratory distress syndrome

Key words: Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia; Conventional Mechanical Ventilation; High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation

Citation: Kapuangan C, Ramlan AAW, Zahra R, Rahendra, Soenarto RF, Hanawi E. Conventional mechanical ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia of neonates: a systematic review. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(6):000−000 ; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i6.2048

Author Biographies

Christopher Kapuangan

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia

Andi Ade Wijaya Ramlan

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia

Raihanita Zahra

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia

Dr Rahendra

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia

Ratna Farida Soenarto

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia

Ezra Hanawi

Hanawi, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta-10430, Indonesia.

Published
02-11-2022
How to Cite
Kapuangan, C., Wijaya Ramlan, A., Zahra, R., Rahendra, D., Soenarto, R., & Hanawi, E. (2022). Conventional mechanical ventilation versus high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in congenital diaphragmatic hernia of neonates: a systematic review. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 26(6), 794-801. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i6.2048
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH