Intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone or with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized comparative study

  • Shiv Shankar
  • Bikram Kumar Gupta
  • Madhup Kumar Singh
  • Arun Raj Pandey
  • Vandana Dwivedi
  • Sumit Sachan
Keywords: Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage, Bupivacaine / administration & dosage, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / adverse effects, Dexmedetomidine, Intraperitoneal, Bupivacaine, Visual analogue scale, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis, Pain, Postoperative / etiology, Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control

Abstract

Background & objetives: Laparoscopic procedures are usually followed by postoperative pain of variable intensity. The pain occurs due to streching of the visceral organs and peritoneum. We compared the antinociceptive effect of intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine with a combination of bupivacaine and dexmedetomidine in laparoscopic surgery. We assessed the quality of analgesia, time to the first request of rescue analgesia and total analgesics required in the first 24 h.

Methodology: After institutional ethical committee approval a total of 162 patients were selected, out of which 81 patients were allocated into two groups using table of randomization. Group B received 0.25 % bupivacaine 50 ml with 5 ml normal saline and Group BD received 0.25 % bupivacaine 50 ml plus dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg diluted in 5 ml of normal saline intraperitoneally.

Results: We found a significant difference between mean VAS scores of the two groups in all time points (p < 0.05). There was significant difference between mean time to the first request for analgesia and the mean total dose for analgesic required (p < 0.05) in between both groups.

Conclusion: We conclude that intraperitoneal instillation of dexmedetomidine 1 µg kg in combination with bupivacaine 0.25% in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly reduces the postoperative pain and analgesic requirement in postoperative period when compared to bupivacaine 0.25% alone.

Abbreviations: VAS – Visual analog scale; NS - Normal saline; PACU - post‑anesthesia care unit; HR – Heart rate;

Key words: Anesthetics, Local / administration & dosage; Bupivacaine / administration & dosage; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic / adverse effects; Dexmedetomidine, Intraperitoneal; Bupivacaine; Visual analogue scale; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative / diagnosis; Pain, Postoperative / etiology; Pain, Postoperative / prevention & control

Citation: Shankar S, Gupta BK, Singh MK, Pandey AR, Dwivedi V, Sachan S. Intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone or with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized comparative study. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2022;26(3):347-351. DOI: 10.35975/apic.v26i3.1909

Received: August 09, 2021; Reviewed: November 19, 2021; Accepted: December 09, 2021

 

Author Biographies

Shiv Shankar

Shiv Shankar, Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, UP, India

Bikram Kumar Gupta

Bikram Kumar Gupta, Department of Anesthesiology, Heritage Institute of Medical Sciences, Varanasi-221005, UP, India

Madhup Kumar Singh

Madhup Kumar Singh, Department of Anesthesia, Rama Medical College, Kanpur, UP, India

Arun Raj Pandey

Arun Raj Pandey, Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, UP, India

Vandana Dwivedi

Vandana Dwivedi, Department of Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, UP, India

Sumit Sachan

Sumit Sachan, Department of Anesthesiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, UP, India

Published
04-06-2022
How to Cite
Shankar, S., Gupta, B., Singh, M., Pandey, A., Dwivedi, V., & Sachan, S. (2022). Intraperitoneal bupivacaine alone or with dexmedetomidine for post-operative analgesia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized comparative study. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 26(3), 347-351. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v26i3.1909
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH