Comparison of visibility and block success between Echoplex+® and Stimuplex®-Ultraline 360○ echogenic needles for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery

  • Suki Ismet
  • Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan
  • Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan
  • Laila Ab Mukmin
  • Soon Eu Chong
  • Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini
Keywords: Echogenic needle, Visibility, Ultrasound-guided, Supraclavicular block, Brachial plexus

Abstract

Background: Needle visibility is an important factor in the success of ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve block.  This study aimed to compare needle visibility, block performance, time to perform block and the block success by the two echogenic needles, the Echoplex+® and the Stimuplex® Ultraline 360°, during ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SBPB).

Methodology: Seventy patients scheduled for upper limb surgery under SBPB were randomised into two groups: Group E (n = 35) was blocked using an Echoplex+® needle and Group S (n = 35) was blocked using a Stimuplex® Ultraline 360° needle. All patients received 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% using the same brand of ultrasound machine. The needle visibility, time to perform block and block success were recorded.

Results: Needle visibility was not found to be significantly different between the groups (p = 0.241). The medians of the time to perform block (11.0 [IQR 6] vs. 10.0 [IQR 4] min; p = 0.278) and the percentages of adequate blocks (p = 0.565) were also not found to be statistically significantly different.

Conclusion: No statistically significant differences, in terms of needle visibility, time to perform block and the block success, were found between the Echoplex+® and the Stimuplex® Ultraline 360° block needles during supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Hence, both were equally effective for the performance of the block.

Key words: Echogenic needle; Visibility; Ultrasound-guided; Supraclavicular block; Brachial plexus

Citation: Ismet LA, Hassan WMNW, Mazlan MZ, Mukmin LA, Chong SE, Zaini RHM. Comparison of visibility and block success between Echoplex+® and Stimuplex®-Ultraline 360○ echogenic needles for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery. Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(6):788–792;

DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i6.1703

Citation: July 26, 2021, Reviewed: August 02, 2021, Accepted: October 03, 2021

Author Biographies

Suki Ismet

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Mohd Zulfakar Mazlan

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Laila Ab Mukmin

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Soon Eu Chong

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.

Published
01-12-2021
How to Cite
Ismet, S., Wan Hassan, W., Mazlan, M., Mukmin, L., Chong, S., & Mohamad Zaini, R. (2021). Comparison of visibility and block success between Echoplex+® and Stimuplex®-Ultraline 360○ echogenic needles for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb surgery. Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care, 25(6), 788-792. https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i6.1703
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Most read articles by the same author(s)